Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1440

reference
118-tree-1
name
1440
tree-preservation-order

undefined

118-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030719 50.866538)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030648 50.866531,-1.030651 50.866545,-1.030661 50.866557,-1.030677 50.866567,-1.030696 50.866574,-1.030718 50.866576,-1.030740 50.866574,-1.030760 50.866568,-1.030776 50.866558,-1.030786 50.866546,-1.030790 50.866532,-1.030787 50.866518,-1.030777 50.866505,-1.030762 50.866495,-1.030742 50.866489,-1.030720 50.866486,-1.030698 50.866488,-1.030678 50.866495,-1.030662 50.866504,-1.030652 50.866517,-1.030648 50.866531)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL